Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL So 07.07.2024 00:00:03 51.073 +43 2.174.783 42,6 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Sa 06.07.2024 00:00:28 51.030 +43 2.171.323 42,5 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Fr 05.07.2024 00:00:08 50.987 +26 2.167.586 42,5 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Do 04.07.2024 00:00:11 50.961 +42 2.163.949 42,5 Vivaldi Social 4.2.9 1.337 Mi 03.07.2024 00:00:04 50.919 +42 2.160.792 42,4 Vivaldi Social 4.2.9 1.337 Di 02.07.2024 00:01:14 50.877 +42 2.156.674 42,4 Vivaldi Social 4.2.9 1.337 Mo 01.07.2024 00:01:17 50.835 +40 2.153.375 42,4 Vivaldi Social 4.2.9 1.337 So 30.06.2024 00:00:05 50.795 +42 2.150.142 42,3 Vivaldi Social 4.2.9 1.337 Sa 29.06.2024 00:03:01 50.753 +38 2.148.751 42,3 Vivaldi Social 4.2.9 1.337 Fr 28.06.2024 00:04:34 50.715 0 2.144.639 42,3 Vivaldi Social 4.2.9 1.337
Patricia Aas (@Patricia) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 5.894 · Folger: 4.845
So 07.07.2024 06:57
95/ so far my (quite shallow) understanding is that these “accounting models” model flows of money. With the basic premise that money has to come from somewhere and go somewhere. Or more accounting-wise that a subtraction one place has to lead to an addition of equal size (possibly the sum of multiple additions) somewhere else.
This relates to the idea that MMT presents, which Wynne Godley also seems to have supported and Richard Vague (above article and TED talk), that a deficit for the state necessitates a surplus somewhere else. Found this graph from Godley using his “sectoral financial balances” framework, depicting the US economy. This graph is very similar (perhaps identical?) to what Vague shows in his TED talk. They both show what seems to be an inverse relationship between a public deficit and a private surplus.
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Ivory for iOS