Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Mo 05.08.2024 00:00:10 52.303 +40 2.256.956 43,2 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 So 04.08.2024 00:00:02 52.263 +36 2.253.188 43,1 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Sa 03.08.2024 00:00:13 52.227 +51 2.253.058 43,1 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Fr 02.08.2024 00:01:10 52.176 +46 2.248.590 43,1 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Do 01.08.2024 00:00:51 52.130 +42 2.244.590 43,1 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Mi 31.07.2024 00:00:20 52.088 +39 2.240.554 43,0 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Di 30.07.2024 00:00:02 52.049 +40 2.237.534 43,0 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Mo 29.07.2024 00:00:19 52.009 +38 2.234.567 43,0 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 So 28.07.2024 00:00:25 51.971 +44 2.231.579 42,9 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Sa 27.07.2024 00:00:08 51.927 0 2.228.252 42,9 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337
pelavarre (@pelavarre) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 1.913 · Folger: 61
Mo 05.08.2024 21:08
Our Static Analyses presently don't guard against the most basic Gcc thing of calling Print without enough Args
def func() -> None:
v1 = "xyz"
print("{v2}".format(v2=v2) # this is legit
v3 = "abcdef"
print("{v3}") # this is a common copy-paste edit mistake in which we lost the initial 'f"' and wrongly shipped '"'
print(f"{len(v3)}")
func()
Adoptees of Python F Strings are dropping themselves straight back into the horrible old Py world of Prints with the wrong number of Args don't surface till run-time of some obscure corner case
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Web