Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Mo 05.08.2024 00:00:10 52.303 +40 2.256.956 43,2 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 So 04.08.2024 00:00:02 52.263 +36 2.253.188 43,1 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Sa 03.08.2024 00:00:13 52.227 +51 2.253.058 43,1 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Fr 02.08.2024 00:01:10 52.176 +46 2.248.590 43,1 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Do 01.08.2024 00:00:51 52.130 +42 2.244.590 43,1 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Mi 31.07.2024 00:00:20 52.088 +39 2.240.554 43,0 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Di 30.07.2024 00:00:02 52.049 +40 2.237.534 43,0 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Mo 29.07.2024 00:00:19 52.009 +38 2.234.567 43,0 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 So 28.07.2024 00:00:25 51.971 +44 2.231.579 42,9 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337 Sa 27.07.2024 00:00:08 51.927 0 2.228.252 42,9 Vivaldi Social 4.2.10 1.337
pelavarre (@pelavarre) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 1.914 · Folger: 61
Mo 05.08.2024 21:09
Now, fair enough, this mistake raises no Exception to disrupt Control Flow. But it sure does recklessly destroy the often-critical Logging Data to say how we went wong
We should fix this with a sharp enough static analysis to accept dynamically passing around Strings with "{}" in them but still reject Literal Strings plainly miscalled in this way. If you really meant to say that, then we should make you Code it plainly. How about our PyPi·Black step of Static Analysis should rewrite this to carry its meaning much more plainly and visibly
print(f"{{v3}}")
Presently Flake8 defaults to stand in the way of this fix. This explicit statement of what you actually called for blows out over
F541 f-string is missing placeholders
They do allow the explicit form
print("{{" "v3" "}}")
Maybe that's what we need here, to slap the living people with a loud enough visual noise so that they really do start to see the missing F's at review-time, stop punting them to RunTime
I dunno. I only know this is a real problem, because of the actual Developer Experiences of C Compilers other than Gcc that do this poorly
I do very much wonder how this our Static Datatype Analysers will get better at covering this gap sometime soon
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Web