Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Sa 13.07.2024 00:00:07 7.216 +1 601.736 83,4 NerdCulture 4.2.10 1.000 Fr 12.07.2024 00:01:56 7.215 -1 601.162 83,3 NerdCulture 4.2.10 1.000 Do 11.07.2024 00:00:16 7.216 0 600.675 83,2 NerdCulture 4.2.10 1.000 Mi 10.07.2024 00:00:02 7.216 0 600.179 83,2 NerdCulture 4.2.10 1.000 Di 09.07.2024 00:00:03 7.216 -1 599.665 83,1 NerdCulture 4.2.10 1.000 Mo 08.07.2024 00:01:18 7.217 0 599.198 83,0 NerdCulture 4.2.10 1.000 So 07.07.2024 00:00:01 7.217 0 598.597 82,9 NerdCulture 4.2.10 1.000 Sa 06.07.2024 00:00:40 7.217 0 598.148 82,9 NerdCulture 4.2.10 1.000 Fr 05.07.2024 00:01:08 7.217 -1 597.685 82,8 NerdCulture 4.2.10 500 Do 04.07.2024 00:00:05 7.218 0 596.869 82,7 NerdCulture 4.2.9 500
(@tentacular) · 10/2022 · Tröts: 179 · Folger: 28
Sa 13.07.2024 08:33
It's obvious to me that lots of the major news pubs are out to shiv Biden (pretty much all of them except the Philadelphia Inquirer, the LA Times, maybe a few others), but the Washington Post's changing headlines on this article are particularly hilarious. As a native English speaker, who ever says "newly fiery [thing]"? It would typically be "fiery new [thing]", unless you're bending over backwards to subtly imply the speech isn't the new part, the fact that it's "fiery" is the new part.
Not to mention the changing headlines themselves, which made me double-check I was even on the correct article.
Several archived screenshots of the same Washington Post article as shown on archive.is. The headline changes chronologically from "Biden heading to Michigan for rally after high-stakes news conference" to "Biden faces more calls to withdraw as he visits Michigan to rally support" to "Biden delivers newly fiery speech declaring Trump unfit to be president."
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Web