mastodonien.de

mastodon.world

Zeitpunkt              Nutzer    Delta   Tröts        TNR     Titel                     Version  maxTL
Mo 01.07.2024 00:00:30   183.015      -3    5.874.502    32,1 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
So 30.06.2024 00:00:07   183.018      +8    5.869.053    32,1 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
Sa 29.06.2024 00:03:02   183.010     +10    5.863.998    32,0 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
Fr 28.06.2024 00:04:36   183.000      +7    5.857.209    32,0 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
Do 27.06.2024 00:00:41   182.993      +9    5.853.212    32,0 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
Mi 26.06.2024 00:00:11   182.984      +2    5.848.200    32,0 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
Di 25.06.2024 00:00:08   182.982      +7    5.842.468    31,9 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
Mo 24.06.2024 00:00:42   182.975     +11    5.837.478    31,9 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
So 23.06.2024 00:00:02   182.964     +13    5.833.287    31,9 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500
Sa 22.06.2024 00:00:25   182.951       0    5.828.574    31,9 Mastodon                  4.2.9      500

Mo 01.07.2024 17:10

NYT Zusammenfassung zum Urteil zu
Es sieht jedenfalls überhaupt nicht gut aus, vllt noch übler als erwartet. In jedem Fall gibt es wohl keine Entscheidung VOR dem Wahltag, und Trump könnte nach Wiederwahl alle Anklagen fallen lassen.
fuckfuckfuck🤬

Here’s what to know: The ruling: The justices said that Mr. Trump is immune from prosecution for official acts taken during his presidency but that there was a crucial distinction between official and private conduct. The case returns to the lower court, which will decide whether the actions Mr. Trump took were in an official or private capacity. The charges: The former president faces three charges of conspiracy and one count of obstructing an official proceeding, all related to his efforts to cling to the presidency after his 2020 loss. He was indicted last August by the special counsel, Jack Smith, in one of two federal criminal cases against him; the other relates to the F.B.I. raid on his private club, Mar-a-Lago, in August 2022 that recovered missing government documents. Lower courts ruled against Trump: The trial judge, Tanya S. Chutkan of the Federal District Court in Washington, denied Mr. Trump’s immunity request in December. “Whatever immunities a sitting president may enjoy, the United States has only one chief executive at a time, and that position does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass,” she wrote.

Here’s what to know: The ruling: The justices said that Mr. Trump is immune from prosecution for official acts taken during his presidency but that there was a crucial distinction between official and private conduct. The case returns to the lower court, which will decide whether the actions Mr. Trump took were in an official or private capacity. The charges: The former president faces three charges of conspiracy and one count of obstructing an official proceeding, all related to his efforts to cling to the presidency after his 2020 loss. He was indicted last August by the special counsel, Jack Smith, in one of two federal criminal cases against him; the other relates to the F.B.I. raid on his private club, Mar-a-Lago, in August 2022 that recovered missing government documents. Lower courts ruled against Trump: The trial judge, Tanya S. Chutkan of the Federal District Court in Washington, denied Mr. Trump’s immunity request in December. “Whatever immunities a sitting president may enjoy, the United States has only one chief executive at a time, and that position does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass,” she wrote.

A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed in February, saying that “any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as president no longer protects him against this prosecution.” The timing: Even before the ruling, the court’s decision to take up the case already helped Mr. Trump’s strategy to delay his prosecution until after the November election. With this ruling, the prospects for a trial before the election seem increasingly remote. If Mr. Trump prevails at the polls, he could order the Justice Department to drop the charges. Other Jan. 6 cases: The court heard two other cases this term concerning the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, both of which relate to Mr. Trump. One — an attempt to bar Mr. Trump from the ballot in Colorado under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which made people who engages in insurrection ineligible to hold office — was unanimously rejected in March. The other limited the use of a federal obstruction law to prosecute members of the mob who stormed the Capitol. Two of the four charges against Mr. Trump are based on that law.

A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed in February, saying that “any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as president no longer protects him against this prosecution.” The timing: Even before the ruling, the court’s decision to take up the case already helped Mr. Trump’s strategy to delay his prosecution until after the November election. With this ruling, the prospects for a trial before the election seem increasingly remote. If Mr. Trump prevails at the polls, he could order the Justice Department to drop the charges. Other Jan. 6 cases: The court heard two other cases this term concerning the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, both of which relate to Mr. Trump. One — an attempt to bar Mr. Trump from the ballot in Colorado under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which made people who engages in insurrection ineligible to hold office — was unanimously rejected in March. The other limited the use of a federal obstruction law to prosecute members of the mob who stormed the Capitol. Two of the four charges against Mr. Trump are based on that law.

[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0

Antw. · Weiterl. · Fav. · Lesez. · Pin · Stumm · Löschen