mastodonien.de

mastodon.world

Zeitpunkt              Nutzer    Delta   Tröts        TNR     Titel                     Version  maxTL
Di 06.08.2024 00:00:19   183.234      +6    6.068.665    33,1 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
Mo 05.08.2024 00:00:37   183.228     +11    6.062.211    33,1 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
So 04.08.2024 00:00:05   183.217      +7    6.056.129    33,1 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
Sa 03.08.2024 00:00:20   183.210      +7    6.052.651    33,0 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
Fr 02.08.2024 00:00:35   183.203     +12    6.045.294    33,0 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
Do 01.08.2024 00:00:01   183.191     +12    6.038.565    33,0 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
Mi 31.07.2024 00:00:15   183.179      +6    6.031.133    32,9 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
Di 30.07.2024 00:00:10   183.173      +7    6.024.756    32,9 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
Mo 29.07.2024 00:00:04   183.166      +5    6.018.624    32,9 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500
So 28.07.2024 00:00:02   183.161       0    6.012.150    32,8 Mastodon                  4.2.10     500

Di 06.08.2024 17:10

Saya Olivia Hayashi 3 April at 23:46 - Please stop saying you

Saya Olivia Hayashi 3 April at 23:46 - Please stop saying you "researched it." You didn't research anything and its highly probable that you dont even know how to do so. Did you compile a literature review and write abstracts on each article? Or better yet, did you collect a random sample of sources and perform independent probability statistics on the reported results? No? Did you at least take each article, one by one and look into the source that would be the author, publisher and funder), then critique the writing for logical fallacies, cognitive distortions and plain inaccuracies. Did you ask yourself why this source might publish these particular results? Did you follow the trail of references and apply the same source of scrutiny to them? No? Then you didnt fucking research anything. You read or watched a video, most likely with little to no objectivity. You came across something in your algorithm manipulated feed, something that jived with your implicit biases and served your confirmation bias, and subconsciously applied your emotional filters and called it proof. Scary-

[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Mastodon for iOS

Antw. · Weiterl. · Fav. · Lesez. · Pin · Stumm · Löschen