Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Mo 08.07.2024 00:00:11 174.537 +27 8.457.390 48,5 mas.to 4.2.10 500 So 07.07.2024 00:03:45 174.510 +39 8.448.127 48,4 mas.to 4.2.10 500 Sa 06.07.2024 00:00:23 174.471 +42 8.438.674 48,4 mas.to 4.2.10 500 Fr 05.07.2024 00:00:03 174.429 +19 8.426.582 48,3 mas.to 4.2.10 500 Do 04.07.2024 00:01:28 174.410 +44 8.416.468 48,3 mas.to 4.2.9 500 Mi 03.07.2024 00:00:56 174.366 +30 8.405.585 48,2 mas.to 4.2.9 500 Di 02.07.2024 00:02:16 174.336 +24 8.395.966 48,2 mas.to 4.2.9 500 Mo 01.07.2024 00:00:40 174.312 +16 8.385.949 48,1 mas.to 4.2.9 500 So 30.06.2024 00:00:21 174.296 +33 8.377.804 48,1 mas.to 4.2.9 500 Sa 29.06.2024 00:03:03 174.263 0 8.368.240 48,0 mas.to 4.2.9 500
John Porter (@maletero) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 1.268 · Folger: 31
Mo 08.07.2024 20:31
Over the past couple weeks I've listened to a couple books about Bayesian statistics. It has been interesting and frustrating.
It *seems* like Bayesians are claiming they've found a hammer l that makes every statistical problem a nail. Anyone using a different tool is misguided, acting in bad faith, or just as often, an idiot.
Has classical statistics propped up a bunch of bad science? Yes! Would Bayes sort all this out? No. It just introduces different problems.
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Web