mastodonien.de

mas.to

Zeitpunkt              Nutzer    Delta   Tröts        TNR     Titel                     Version  maxTL
Mo 01.07.2024 00:00:40   174.312     +16    8.385.949    48,1 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
So 30.06.2024 00:00:21   174.296     +33    8.377.804    48,1 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
Sa 29.06.2024 00:03:03   174.263     +39    8.368.240    48,0 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
Fr 28.06.2024 00:04:37   174.224     +24    8.358.392    48,0 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
Do 27.06.2024 00:00:01   174.200     +19    8.350.507    47,9 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
Mi 26.06.2024 00:00:16   174.181     +48    8.340.763    47,9 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
Di 25.06.2024 00:00:22   174.133     +35    8.330.683    47,8 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
Mo 24.06.2024 00:00:03   174.098     +20    8.321.040    47,8 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
So 23.06.2024 00:00:25   174.078     +21    8.312.363    47,8 mas.to                    4.2.9      500
Sa 22.06.2024 00:01:02   174.057       0    8.304.401    47,7 mas.to                    4.2.9      500

Mo 01.07.2024 22:21

I can share a screenshot. This is also for me to find more easily later.

Text. '2. Preventing the Erosion of Democracy. Some proponents of expansion believe it to be essential to address the urgent circumstances brought on by developments in the Court’s jurisprudence that predate recent confirmation controversies but that have been accelerated by those appointments. They believe that these developments threaten to seriously and perhaps irreversibly damage the democratic process. These critics maintain that the Supreme Court has been complicit in and partially responsible for the

Text. '2. Preventing the Erosion of Democracy. Some proponents of expansion believe it to be essential to address the urgent circumstances brought on by developments in the Court’s jurisprudence that predate recent confirmation controversies but that have been accelerated by those appointments. They believe that these developments threaten to seriously and perhaps irreversibly damage the democratic process. These critics maintain that the Supreme Court has been complicit in and partially responsible for the "degradation of American democracy” writ large. On this view, the Court has whittled away the Voting Rights Act and other cornerstones of democracy, and affirmed state laws and practices that restrict voting and disenfranchise certain constituencies, such as people of color, the poor, and the young. This has contributed to circumstances that threaten to give outsized power over the future of the presidency and therefore the Court to one political party and to entrench that power. As one witness before the Commission put it, the current Court “could easily invalidate federal legislation containing . . . democracy-entrenching measures . . . Those same Justices could easily invalidate measures designed to reduce the influence of money in politics, increase the transparency of political spending, restore the preclearance provision of the Voting Rights Act, and ameliorate economic inequality.”' For more, go to the PDF of the Final Report.

[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0

Antw. · Weiterl. · Fav. · Lesez. · Pin · Stumm · Löschen