Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Di 08.10.2024 00:02:43 1.063 0 73.432 69,1 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 Mo 07.10.2024 00:00:16 1.063 0 73.392 69,0 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 So 06.10.2024 00:04:04 1.063 0 73.370 69,0 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 Sa 05.10.2024 00:00:21 1.063 0 73.331 69,0 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 Fr 04.10.2024 00:04:55 1.063 0 73.286 68,9 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 Do 03.10.2024 00:04:06 1.063 0 73.255 68,9 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 Mi 02.10.2024 00:14:23 1.063 0 73.215 68,9 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 Di 01.10.2024 00:14:10 1.063 0 73.193 68,9 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 Mo 30.09.2024 00:03:54 1.063 0 73.152 68,8 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500 So 29.09.2024 00:04:45 1.063 0 73.095 68,8 Macaw-Social 4.2.12 500
Chad Weider (@cweider) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 150 · Folger: 73
Di 08.10.2024 07:28
Also in this argument is the first and only mention of the video game Pac-Man, where it was used metaphorically, in closing by petitioner’s advocate, to the describe the rapacity of the Illinois plaintiff’s bar.
I think this says something about the cultural phenomenon that the game was: Pac-Man’s release came in 1980… this argument was in 1982!
Transcript of Oral Argument at 52, Gillette Co. v. Miner 459 US 86 (1982) (No. 81-1493)
Now, is the State of Illinois going to apply that principle, or is the major consumer policy of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts – and I could list dozens of comparable illustrations – simply going to be ignored as the State of Illinois plays PacMan with its little electronic monster going around the screen gobbling up $7.95 claims saying oh, they’re just dots, they’re just dots; because that really is what is at issue in this cases whether consistent with interstate federalism you will allow a court with no contacts to do that.
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Ivory for Mac