mastodonien.de

ieji.de

Zeitpunkt              Nutzer    Delta   Tröts        TNR     Titel                     Version  maxTL
So 21.07.2024 00:00:13    14.412      +4      338.284    23,5 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
Sa 20.07.2024 00:01:18    14.408      +1      337.944    23,5 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
Fr 19.07.2024 14:01:20    14.407      +5      337.717    23,4 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
Do 18.07.2024 00:01:29    14.402       0      337.194    23,4 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
Mi 17.07.2024 00:01:18    14.402      +1      336.860    23,4 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
Di 16.07.2024 00:01:26    14.401      +4      337.189    23,4 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
Mo 15.07.2024 00:01:16    14.397      +2      336.760    23,4 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
So 14.07.2024 00:01:16    14.395      +1      336.442    23,4 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
Sa 13.07.2024 00:01:12    14.394      +4      336.199    23,4 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500
Fr 12.07.2024 00:02:20    14.390       0      335.867    23,3 ieji.de                   4.2.10     500

So 21.07.2024 15:36

Jurisdiction of the Court to give the advisory opinion requested. Article 65, paragraph 1, of the Statute — Article 96, paragraph 1, of the Charter — Competence of the General Assembly to seek advisory opinions — Request made in accordance with the Charter — Questions submitted to the Court are legal in character. The Court has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested.

Jurisdiction of the Court to give the advisory opinion requested. Article 65, paragraph 1, of the Statute — Article 96, paragraph 1, of the Charter — Competence of the General Assembly to seek advisory opinions — Request made in accordance with the Charter — Questions submitted to the Court are legal in character. The Court has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested.

Scope and meaning of the questions posed by the General Assembly. Material scope — Question (a) identifies three types of conduct which question (b) describes as policies and practices of Israel — Assumption under terms of question (a) that these policies and practices are contrary to international law — It is, however, for the Court to determine lawfulness of policies and practices identified by the General Assembly — Methods of proof applied by the Court — No need for the Court to make findings of fact with regard to specific incidents. Territorial scope — Palestinian territory occupied since 1967 encompassing the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip — The “Occupied Palestinian Territory” constituting, from legal standpoint, a single territorial unit.

Scope and meaning of the questions posed by the General Assembly. Material scope — Question (a) identifies three types of conduct which question (b) describes as policies and practices of Israel — Assumption under terms of question (a) that these policies and practices are contrary to international law — It is, however, for the Court to determine lawfulness of policies and practices identified by the General Assembly — Methods of proof applied by the Court — No need for the Court to make findings of fact with regard to specific incidents. Territorial scope — Palestinian territory occupied since 1967 encompassing the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip — The “Occupied Palestinian Territory” constituting, from legal standpoint, a single territorial unit.

Settlement policy. Since removal of Israel’s settlements from the Gaza Strip in 2005, Israel’s settlement policy has continued in the West Bank and East Jerusalem — The Court to limit its analysis to Israel’s ongoing settlement policy in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Transfer by Israel of settlers to the West Bank and East Jerusalem, as well as maintenance of their presence, contrary to sixth paragraph of Article 49 of Fourth Geneva Convention — Expansion of Israel’s settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem based on confiscation or requisitioning of large areas of land — Land policies of Israel not in conformity with Articles 46, 52 and 55 of Hague Regulations.

Settlement policy. Since removal of Israel’s settlements from the Gaza Strip in 2005, Israel’s settlement policy has continued in the West Bank and East Jerusalem — The Court to limit its analysis to Israel’s ongoing settlement policy in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Transfer by Israel of settlers to the West Bank and East Jerusalem, as well as maintenance of their presence, contrary to sixth paragraph of Article 49 of Fourth Geneva Convention — Expansion of Israel’s settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem based on confiscation or requisitioning of large areas of land — Land policies of Israel not in conformity with Articles 46, 52 and 55 of Hague Regulations.

[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Web

Antw. · Weiterl. · Fav. · Lesez. · Pin · Stumm · Löschen