Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Sa 10.08.2024 00:00:02 61.979 +2 3.620.040 58,4 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Fr 09.08.2024 00:00:16 61.977 -1 3.617.019 58,4 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Do 08.08.2024 00:00:21 61.978 +1 3.614.789 58,3 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Mi 07.08.2024 00:00:08 61.977 +2 3.611.687 58,3 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Di 06.08.2024 00:00:37 61.975 +4 3.608.594 58,2 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Mo 05.08.2024 00:00:05 61.971 +5 3.606.116 58,2 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 So 04.08.2024 00:00:02 61.966 +2 3.604.482 58,2 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Sa 03.08.2024 00:00:05 61.964 -2 3.602.552 58,1 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Fr 02.08.2024 00:00:23 61.966 -4 3.599.813 58,1 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Do 01.08.2024 00:01:11 61.970 0 3.596.601 58,0 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500
bert hubert 🇺🇦🇪🇺 (@bert_hubert) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 5.021 · Folger: 5.561
Sa 10.08.2024 13:08
Recently, some countries have restarted attempts to buy new nuclear reactors. In this post, I first set out why getting new nuclear power by 2038 is a nuts idea, but then take a look at energy diversification, which changes the picture a bit. However, the way we are going about ordering nuclear power is just plain wrong, and it is unlikely we'll do better. If so, we are better off spending the nuclear trillions on other ways of getting carbon-free and reliable energy: https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/nuclear-no-yes-maybe-but-not-like-this/
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0