Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL So 11.08.2024 00:00:00 61.982 +3 3.622.897 58,5 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Sa 10.08.2024 00:00:02 61.979 +2 3.620.040 58,4 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Fr 09.08.2024 00:00:16 61.977 -1 3.617.019 58,4 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Do 08.08.2024 00:00:21 61.978 +1 3.614.789 58,3 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Mi 07.08.2024 00:00:08 61.977 +2 3.611.687 58,3 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Di 06.08.2024 00:00:37 61.975 +4 3.608.594 58,2 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Mo 05.08.2024 00:00:05 61.971 +5 3.606.116 58,2 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 So 04.08.2024 00:00:02 61.966 +2 3.604.482 58,2 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Sa 03.08.2024 00:00:05 61.964 -2 3.602.552 58,1 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Fr 02.08.2024 00:00:23 61.966 0 3.599.813 58,1 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500
(@mort) · 05/2019 · Tröts: 1.627 · Folger: 171
So 11.08.2024 17:14
There's a thing I don't get about #flatpak and and #GNOME Software and stuff in #Fedora #Linux. As far as I know, this Spotify flatpak (see screenshot) is unofficial; not from Spotify. But how am I as a user supposed to know that? Is a user supposed to just intuit that the LACK OF a "verified" badge next to the "Spotify" name means that some rando created this package and published it under the fake developer name 'Spotify'?
How is this not absolutely horrible from a #security perspective?
Screenshot of the Spotify page in GNOME Software on Fedora, with no indication that the software isn't officially packaged by Spotify
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0