Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Di 09.07.2024 00:00:08 61.924 +2 3.527.175 57,0 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Mo 08.07.2024 00:00:19 61.922 +5 3.524.369 56,9 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 So 07.07.2024 00:00:04 61.917 0 3.522.885 56,9 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Sa 06.07.2024 00:00:07 61.917 -2 3.523.632 56,9 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Fr 05.07.2024 00:00:27 61.919 0 3.520.710 56,9 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Do 04.07.2024 00:00:52 61.919 +2 3.517.337 56,8 Fosstodon 4.2.9 500 Mi 03.07.2024 00:00:12 61.917 +2 3.513.906 56,8 Fosstodon 4.2.9 500 Di 02.07.2024 00:01:44 61.915 -2 3.510.479 56,7 Fosstodon 4.2.9 500 Mo 01.07.2024 00:00:33 61.917 0 3.507.420 56,6 Fosstodon 4.2.9 500 So 30.06.2024 00:00:34 61.917 0 3.504.671 56,6 Fosstodon 4.2.9 500
Stephen Eglen (@sje) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 813 · Folger: 469
Di 09.07.2024 11:10
Plan S recently released their analysis of 2023 data for transformative journals.
https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/transformative-journals-analysis-from-the-2023-reports/
Summary: "learned society and university press publishers tend to be more successful in transitioning than their commercial counterparts. "
Well done to Cambridge University Press, Royal Society and Company of Biologists.
Unsurprisingly, Springer Nature and Elsevier fared poorly, yet still we continue to support these publishers.
As for the American Chemical Society - sigh.
Figure 3 of the analysis from Plan S (top URL in text). It shows the number of TJ titles each publisher flipped to OA.
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0