Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Mi 11.09.2024 00:01:06 62.069 +4 3.702.173 59,6 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 Di 10.09.2024 00:00:05 62.065 -1 3.698.935 59,6 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 Mo 09.09.2024 00:00:08 62.066 +2 3.696.609 59,6 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 So 08.09.2024 00:00:15 62.064 +5 3.694.121 59,5 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 Sa 07.09.2024 00:00:44 62.059 +6 3.693.330 59,5 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 Fr 06.09.2024 00:00:33 62.053 +5 3.690.277 59,5 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 Do 05.09.2024 00:01:06 62.048 +2 3.687.723 59,4 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 Mi 04.09.2024 00:01:06 62.046 +1 3.684.706 59,4 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 Di 03.09.2024 00:00:09 62.045 0 3.681.789 59,3 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 Mo 02.09.2024 00:00:32 62.045 0 3.679.515 59,3 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500
Alley Stoughton (@fullyabstract) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 2.709 · Folger: 1.012
Mi 11.09.2024 02:11
It's unbelievable that NYT can't directly say in their articles that tariffs would be paid by American companies to the US government, with the costs largely passed on to the US consumer. In other words, that they are essentially a sales tax. Clearly imposing a sales tax and then using it to, say, pay for childcare is not the same as getting other countries to pay for US childcare. It's not complicated, but the Times can't seem to bear to call it out for the nonsense it is. Why?
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Ivory for Mac