Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Di 23.07.2024 00:00:03 61.956 -3 3.570.705 57,6 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Mo 22.07.2024 00:01:10 61.959 +1 3.567.825 57,6 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 So 21.07.2024 00:01:07 61.958 +1 3.564.861 57,5 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Sa 20.07.2024 00:01:10 61.957 +1 3.561.604 57,5 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Fr 19.07.2024 13:57:34 61.956 -1 3.558.474 57,4 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Do 18.07.2024 00:00:27 61.957 +1 3.553.476 57,4 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Mi 17.07.2024 00:01:10 61.956 -1 3.550.157 57,3 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Di 16.07.2024 00:00:36 61.957 +6 3.547.999 57,3 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 Mo 15.07.2024 00:00:01 61.951 +1 3.544.794 57,2 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500 So 14.07.2024 00:00:00 61.950 0 3.542.390 57,2 Fosstodon 4.2.10 500
Urusan (@urusan) · 04/2020 · Tröts: 15.253 · Folger: 1.220
Di 23.07.2024 14:11
During my earlier thread on the electric demand of AI, I came across this old (for AI) article on AI search which, for me, shed a lot of light onto what Google has probably been thinking https://www.semianalysis.com/p/peeling-the-onions-layers-large-language
Along with my estimates on current electric use, Google's current AI approach seems less insane. They are probably adding 50%-100% electric overhead to run their results through their LLM.
Don't get me wrong, it's still a dumb idea, but it's not the disastrous idea it seemed like.
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Tusky