Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Di 08.10.2024 00:00:02 62.153 +3 3.771.598 60,7 Fosstodon 4.2.13 500 Mo 07.10.2024 00:00:00 62.150 +2 3.768.787 60,6 Fosstodon 4.2.13 500 So 06.10.2024 00:01:07 62.148 +4 3.766.113 60,6 Fosstodon 4.2.13 500 Sa 05.10.2024 00:00:05 62.144 +1 3.764.649 60,6 Fosstodon 4.2.13 500 Fr 04.10.2024 00:00:07 62.143 +3 3.762.219 60,5 Fosstodon 4.2.13 500 Do 03.10.2024 00:00:23 62.140 0 3.759.060 60,5 Fosstodon 4.2.13 500 Mi 02.10.2024 00:00:06 62.140 +1 3.755.928 60,4 Fosstodon 4.2.13 500 Di 01.10.2024 00:01:13 62.139 +1 3.752.620 60,4 Fosstodon 4.2.13 500 Mo 30.09.2024 00:01:12 62.138 +3 3.749.484 60,3 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500 So 29.09.2024 00:01:07 62.135 0 3.746.995 60,3 Fosstodon 4.2.12 500
e11bits :python: :emacs: (@e11bits) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 61 · Folger: 131
Di 08.10.2024 05:16
I guess #emacs BBDB isn't used much these days, let alone with #orgmode. So I guess I should'nt be surprised seeing an error with one of the examples from og-bbdb.el
1998-03-12 %s created bbdb-anniv.el %d years ago
where something like this works:
1973-06-22
1999-04-01 wedding
Anyhow I've sent a bug report to https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2024-10/msg00056.html
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via mastodon.el