Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Di 06.08.2024 00:00:09 5.534 +1 518.344 93,7 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 Mo 05.08.2024 00:00:21 5.533 0 517.842 93,6 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 So 04.08.2024 00:03:40 5.533 0 517.470 93,5 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 Sa 03.08.2024 00:03:48 5.533 +1 516.926 93,4 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 Fr 02.08.2024 00:04:14 5.532 +1 516.348 93,3 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 Do 01.08.2024 00:00:58 5.531 0 515.720 93,2 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 Mi 31.07.2024 00:03:11 5.531 0 515.162 93,1 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 Di 30.07.2024 00:02:57 5.531 0 514.522 93,0 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 Mo 29.07.2024 00:00:47 5.531 +1 514.020 92,9 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500 So 28.07.2024 00:00:02 5.530 0 513.540 92,9 FediScience.org 4.2.10 500
Josh Wells (@josh) · 10/2022 · Tröts: 2.742 · Folger: 2.088
Di 06.08.2024 01:27
Q for #HigherEd: I had student submit “book report” probably written by AI. I gave a zero, not for AI, but b/c general overview of book wasn’t the assignment (it was to relate everything else read in class for a few weeks to the book in order to solve a problem addressed by the book and framed in an essay prompt I supplied). My syllabus does say students may use AI if cited properly (they did not cite).
Should I have forwarded their case for academic misconduct? I did not.
Yes (2)
No (1)
Other (explain in comment) (0)
2024-08-06T23:27:24.018Z
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 1 Wtrl.: 1 Fav.: 0 · via Web