Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Mi 31.07.2024 00:00:31 9.879 +2 556.975 56,4 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 Di 30.07.2024 00:00:30 9.877 +1 555.902 56,3 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 Mo 29.07.2024 00:01:12 9.876 0 555.053 56,2 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 So 28.07.2024 00:00:27 9.876 +1 554.241 56,1 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 Sa 27.07.2024 00:01:12 9.875 +1 553.191 56,0 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 Fr 26.07.2024 00:01:08 9.874 +2 552.199 55,9 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 Do 25.07.2024 00:00:00 9.872 0 550.974 55,8 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 Mi 24.07.2024 00:01:07 9.872 +1 550.210 55,7 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 Di 23.07.2024 00:01:01 9.871 0 549.028 55,6 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000 Mo 22.07.2024 00:00:33 9.871 0 548.116 55,5 Climate Justice Social 4.2.1... 5.000
MatthewToad43 (@matthewtoad43) · 07/2023 · Tröts: 10.300 · Folger: 564
Mi 31.07.2024 11:35
Interesting piece on Biodiversity Net Gain, essentially a form of offsetting where if you damage wildlife while building a new housing estate, you are required to rewild somewhere else (often low quality farmland), including a 10% gain in overall biodiversity.
The new offsetting? Maybe. I'd like to see more analysis of the whole lifecycle; this only talks about one side of the equation. But still, it's driving rewilding, and some construction is hard to avoid at this point given our ongoing housing crisis and all the problems that causes.
Anyone going to argue that we should be demolishing houses and turning them into tower blocks to avoid having to build on the greenbelt?
Mostly I see the greenbelt battles as hypocrisy about spoiling people's views (and therefore property prices). But on the other hand, densification *may* be necessary.
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 1 Fav.: 0 · via Web