mastodonien.de

anonsys.net

Zeitpunkt              Nutzer    Delta   Tröts        TNR     Titel                     Version  maxTL
Mi 10.07.2024 00:03:21       153       0       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
Di 09.07.2024 00:00:53       153       0       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
Mo 08.07.2024 00:03:57       153       0       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
So 07.07.2024 00:01:53       153       0       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
Sa 06.07.2024 00:01:36       153       0       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
Fr 05.07.2024 00:03:30       153       0       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
Do 04.07.2024 00:02:55       153       0       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
Mi 03.07.2024 00:00:24       153       0       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
Di 02.07.2024 00:03:55       153    +153       33.216   217,1 -= anonsys.net =-         2.8.0... 20...
Mo 01.07.2024 00:00:11         0       0            0     0,0                                       0

Mi 10.07.2024 02:22

is out today with 20 security fixes. I encourage you all to switch to another if you use , such as as configured per https://divestos.org/pages/browsers#tuningBrave


I say this because I am not going to work on as it stands. has repeatedly for years now constantly made compiling for from source increasingly difficult. And now there is a second circular dependency which I do not care to handle.
And if this means your choices for a browser all contain proprietary code, then you might as well use one with the most protections available at least

Not Mozilla's user-hostile approach which is Firefox for Android.

extensions? no. about:config? no. actual security features? no.

@mozilla does not care.
Does Brave just want your money and cryptoshit scams? Yes, but at least they have strong privacy features and they inherit the security features of Chromium.
Ultimately Mozilla doesn't care if can be compiled from source
If someone still wants something like F-Droid or Mull they need to put the work in

I've been doing it 7 years now and @relan has done it even longer

I don't see anyone else trying
every single other firefox fork on android contains proprietary blobs, including tor browser of all projects you'd expect not to

they don't care either somehow
compilation of 127 is: < android components < < application services < android components (older) < glean < glean (older) < wasi

126 moved android components into gecko but still depended on an older version that was not in gecko and could be compiled standalone
but not 128 needs a newer but still older version that is now in gecko which means gecko needs to be compiled

so likely solution to compile 128 is: fenix < android components < gecko < application services < android components (older) < gecko (older) < application services (even older) < android components (even older) < glean (even older) < etc.

do you see the loop there?

they expect you to just use their prebuilt older versions

you effectively would always have to bootstrap from that 126 version

you can't do this

it is fucked

Quelle: @divested

XMPP
divestos-mobile@conference.konvers.me

conversations.im/j/divestos-mo…

[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Friendica

Antw. · Weiterl. · Fav. · Lesez. · Pin · Stumm · Löschen